I would say that it is necessary to have an office of primary
responsibility.  If there are duplicate records in the organization, the
duplicate records would be retained for their administrative use and then
disposed of leaving the office of primary responsibility with the official
records for the total retention.  (pfew!!! how is that for a sentence?)  You
get the point.

Then again, if more than one office is doing the same function, would this
not mean there is redundancy of effort?  Could the Records Management area
then jump in and be the hero by saving the cost of the duplicated
area?...... Just a thought.

On 7/6/07, Kim Robinson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> When building a functional classification plan is it necessary to put an
> Office of Primary Responsibility?  If yes, how do you decide which is
> the office of primary responsibility when more than one office could be
> doing the same function?
>
> Edmonton - the 2007 Cultural Capital of Canada. Building Connections to
> arts and culture for all Edmontonians.
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
> present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the
> message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>



-

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]