RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Glossaries - definition(s) of "electronic records" and/or "electronic documents"
From:
"A.Khramtsovsky" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 27 Aug 2007 20:04:26 +0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="windows-1252"; reply-type=original
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
IMHO the term “electronic records” should be defined in RM Glossary. The 
reasons are:

1) The term is widely used (including legislation),

2) The existence of at least two different approaches: e.g. one would 
classify analogue audio- or videotape (or even a fax) as an e-record while 
the other won’t. The second approach considers “electronic records” and 
“digital records” as synonyms while the first one doesn’t.



With my best regards,

Natasha

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2