RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 5 Sep 2007 06:28:44 -0700
Content-Disposition:
inline
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<20070904213749.JRTX5687.outaamta02.mail.tds.net@ITDDT>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (67 lines)
Hi John-

Re: "Seldom in the US do you see the term "recordkeeping" used."
>
> I have to disagree a little bit. In the private sector, including lots of
> news/media statements and discussions about legal/tax issues, I see the
> term
> "recordkeeping" used a lot. In fact, I often use it myself to describe the
> act of keeping records, because (though we don't like admitting it) the
> term
> "records management" is not as widely understood.
> But I regularly see the term recordkeeping used to describe keeping all
> kinds of records, and it is a self-explanatory term. I think that the
> problem is that the term "management" can be used in so many ways that it
> is
> hard to know what it exactly means:



> I see recordkeeping as simply the act of keeping records (wisely or
> unwisely), but explain that to keep records professionally and
> responsibly,
> you need Records Management practices and principles. Both terms seem
> useful.
>


As described above, I agree with your comments... in the US, you DO see
"record keeping" used to describe the act/practice of "keeping records" but
in terms of the storage, maintenance, filing, holding, etc of records.   Not
in the way it was defined in the AUS document.

Recordkeeping
 The making and maintaining of complete, accurate and reliable evidence
of business transactions in the form of recorded information.


To me, the "making" aspect is the key difference  this is a distinct
function that typically occurs outside of the RM function, and can even
occur outside of the organization.  A record can be generated internally or
received from an external source, and RM doesn't necessarily need to be
involved in the process at all until it is "declared a record".

You are right in saying that management can mean many things to many people,
and I feel that even in the 50+ years we have had a professional association
dedicated to the furthering of RM practice and principles, we haven't gotten
the message across well enough.

But, the last thing I'd want to do is try and re-brand what we do to
Corporate Management as Recordkeeping instead of Records Management... at
least here in the US.  More and more articles are being produced related to
compliance activities and other recent legislation that call for the
involvement of records management practices, and I think we're getting
closer to becoming an established source of "good stuff happens here".

Larry

-- 
Larry Medina
Danville, CA
RIM Professional since 1972

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2