Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 20 Sep 2007 12:51:20 -0600 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
yes
>From: Bill Roach <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Topic for Discussion
>Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 09:53:27 -0500
>
>Greetings all,
>
>Just a quick question that will hopefully start a discussion.
>
>I have been giving a great deal of thought about how we could possibly get
>a
>hold on the growth of storage within organizations. I have read or heard
>dozens of suggestions but never a discussion of this one:
>
>Are we increasing the volume of uncontrolled storage by placing storage
>limits on employee email boxes?
>
>My thoughts are this, we typically place storage limits on employee mail
>boxes in the hope that they will go in on a regular basis and discard
>outdated, unnecessary emails and attachments and store those of records
>value in an alternative location. I have long questioned whether this is a
>correct assumption. What I have experienced and seen have convinced me
>that
>it may be a lofty wish but the reality has exactly the opposite effect.
>What I have seen is that employees run as close to the edge as possible and
>still function. When they go over, they find the biggest sized emails and
>store the email and attachment off the radar on the desktop or shared
>drive. Sometimes, a printed copy is made and stashed away so if Justin
>ever
>needs one it will be available.
>
>The result is the storage of multiple, duplicate copies in a wide variety
>of
>locations. The disparate storage locations, methods and naming make
>managing the the information very difficult. While tools do exist to find
>duplicate files, none that I am aware of can find all of the possible
>locations.
>
>All of which leads to my follow-up question:
>
>Would we be better off removing the storage limits on employee mailboxes
>and
>using the functionality of the Exchange Server to manage the volume until
>the information is either deleted or moved to the appropriate content
>repository?
>
>Any thoughts?
>
>Bill R
>
>List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
>Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
>To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
>present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the
>message.
>mailto:[log in to unmask]
_________________________________________________________________
Can you find the hidden words? Take a break and play Seekadoo!
http://club.live.com/seekadoo.aspx?icid=seek_hotmailtextlink1
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|