Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 7 Nov 2007 10:27:51 -0800 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I don't understand how the second vendor would become aware of a missing
records situation before the customer/client. Wouldn't the
customer/client have an inventory of what the vendor has as well as what
is being transferred & also be included, in the loop, before the
physical transfer actually takes place? Of course, there is the
possibility that a person could miss something because we're only human.
But still, if records were returned to the customer/client, for some
reason, the vendor would have a record of it anyway. Or, at least, they
should. If not, the customer/client definitely would.
Steve Morgan
C.J. Segerstrom & Sons, Records Manager
[log in to unmask]
714.438.3228 Phone
714.546.9835 Fax
Information which is not communicated is valueless
Information which cannot be found is worthless
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|