RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:48:27 -0600
Content-Disposition:
inline
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Certificate of Destruction of Transitory Records
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
Graham Kitchen <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines) 
Lijuan Yu wrote "The problem is that you can not prove what have been
destroyed in regards
to the transitory records.I don't have a listing of the transitory
records? how about you? If we don't know what have been destroyed, does it
make any sense to keep the destruction certificates?

What do you think? Many thanks."

I have a feeling that many people are using the Transitory Files category
much the same way that Miscelaneous is used.  This is scarey.  Many things
can fall between the cracks.

Your best bet is to find out what has been included in "Transitory Files" so
that if a discovery action occures, you *can* prove one way or another what
was destroyed.


-- 
Graham Kitchen

(866) 333-2015

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2