Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:28:22 -0600 |
Content-Disposition: |
inline |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 1/31/08, Grevin, Fred <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Yes, I have it at home--alas for me: it'll take me forever to learn the new interface
> (driving me crazy in the meantime). Switching between Word 2003 (my office)
> and Word 2007 (home) makes it worse.
Many organizations (including mine) are still using Office 2003. I
don't expect we'll migrate till middle or late this year. I suspect
we are in the majority of companies.
> I tried the Compatibility Pack--it didn't help, and I'm not about to WASTE MY
> TIME trying to figure out why---which brings us back to the main point: if MS
> wanted to publish this White Paper to a Broad Audience, why use a limited-
> distribution file format?????
I was able to get the viewer to download and installed but did take a
while. Then I attempted to use the viewer to convert to a 2003
version so I could share with my employees and IT manager. Shame on
me - the file size increased dramatically from from 1.5 MB (.docv) to
over 20 MB (.doc). Next time I'll just convert to PDF...
--
Bruce L. White, CRM, PMP
Houston, TX
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|