 
| Sender: |
|
| Date: |
Sun, 13 Jul 2008 18:48:49 -0700 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="utf-8" |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Comments: |
RFC822 error: <W> MESSAGE-ID field duplicated. Last occurrence
was retained.
To: Tom Owens < [log in to unmask]> |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I want to thank everyone who replied to my request on Name Criteria for Electronic Records.
Some good resources and information on naming rules were furnished by Peter K and Taina Makinen. I've passed along.
Robert W. Dalton, CRM
1-253-229-4555
[log in to unmask]
"This communication is intended for the sole use of the individual and entity to whom it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and excempt from disclosure under application law. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately by calling 1-253-229-4555, or by reply to this communication
-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Tom Owens
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 6:06 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [RM] Question on Name Criteria for Electronic Records
Agreed. and you are correct. It is much more critcal in an electronic world (including spaces) indents and extra lines. Can't tell you how many hours I've spent chasing a file for finance because they didn't standardize the terminology.
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|
