The magical Google computers of course...

Everytime I go to an AIIM Conference, some new company claims to be about to
hit the holy grail of autoclassification.  I'd say it's impossible, but
that's not really right.  It all depends on how you define success.  Even
the best records managers and catalogers won't have 100% success in applying
metadata or retention schedules.  What happens when auto (or semi-auto)
classification is almost as accurate as people?
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Peter Kurilecz
<[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Christopher Ferry <
> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > The short answer to that one is because there is no automated search or
> > metadata to go along with the snail-mail.  Also, the storage is more
> > obvious
> > (out-of-sight, out-of-mind).
> >
>
> so who will set up the automated search, identify the metadata, establish
> the doc/record classes, and the appropriate security access?
>
> --
>  Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
> [log in to unmask]
> Richmond, Va
> http://twitter.com/RAINbyte
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RAINbyte/
> Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
> electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
> present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the
> message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]