On Jan 27, 2011, at 12:00 AM, RECMGMT-L automatic digest system wrote:
> From: Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: January 26, 2011 3:20:22 PM EST
> Subject: RAINdrip: How to 'divoirce' your tech vendor
>
>
> Some excellent advice here about how to successfully end an engagement with
> a Tech service provider.
>
> Another way to look at what's presented here is "What can I do differently
> during an active engagement to prevent things form reaching this point?"
>
> http://bit.ly/h4hEBo
>
> Larry
I found it amazing that the existing vendor had such wide ranging access to their system. It seems the contract should have huge penalties for disclosure of confidential information from their system. In this case it was an executive's affair but it could have been the formula for their product or other information that could have been devastating.
It seems some penalty fees should have been built in for exposure or will exposure of company information of any type. This whole issue of IT guys building in back doors so they can get into a system is amazing. A security vendor should be verifying the code of the IT Vendor and defined penalties for failure to maintain secrecy.
Hugh Smith
FIRELOCK Fireproof Modular Vaults
[log in to unmask]
(610) 756-4440 Fax (610) 756-4134
WWW.FIRELOCK.COM
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]