RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:32:01 -0700
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From:
Chris Flynn <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (48 lines)
The more you have the more value there is to a good pre-nup.

Chris Flynn

> Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:15:37 -0500
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: How to 'divorce' your tech vendor....and a wife
> To: [log in to unmask]
> 
> On Jan 27, 2011, at 12:00 AM, RECMGMT-L automatic digest system wrote:
> 
> > From: Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>
> > Date: January 26, 2011 3:20:22 PM EST
> > Subject: RAINdrip: How to 'divoirce' your tech vendor
> > 
> > 
> > Some excellent advice here about how to successfully end an engagement with
> > a Tech service provider.
> > 
> > Another way to look at what's presented here is "What can I do differently
> > during an active engagement to prevent things form reaching this point?"
> > 
> > http://bit.ly/h4hEBo
> > 
> > Larry
> 
> 
> I found it amazing that the existing vendor had such wide ranging access to their system.  It seems the contract should have huge penalties for disclosure of confidential information from their system. In this case it was an executive's affair but it could have been the formula for their product or other information that could have been devastating.
> 
> It seems some penalty fees should have been built in for exposure or will exposure of company information of any type. This whole issue of IT guys building in back doors so they can get into a system is amazing.  A security vendor should be verifying the code of the IT Vendor and defined penalties for failure to maintain secrecy.
> 
> Hugh Smith
> FIRELOCK Fireproof Modular Vaults
> [log in to unmask]
> (610)  756-4440    Fax (610)  756-4134
> WWW.FIRELOCK.COM
> 
> 
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
 		 	   		  
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2