Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:30:20 -0500 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Creamer, William <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
> No. Your assumption is wrong, or at least should be, if you ever hope to
> actually have a working program, as opposed to a nice idea on paper.
> Your first step should be to write out the implementation plan as you
> were requested to do. That should include a full blown Plan that would
> bore any human not in records management to death, and a one page
> "executive summary" with all the stuff you will be asking others to do
> (which is why the Boss wants to see a plan first, he/she wants to know
> what is going to be expected of others). You have to do this yourself as
> an original work, because no one is going to have an implementation plan
> that is going to look like yours.
>
I agree with William that is must be your work. However, that being said it
doesn't hurt to examine what others have done before you from a high level
ie what steps does one need to take to implement the policy. The devil is
always in the details. That said here is a google search that will point you
to a variety of implementation plans for records management. "implementation
plan"+"records management"
http://bit.ly/eq4VBt
--
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va
http://twitter.com/RAINbyte
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RAINbyte/
http://paper.li/RAINbyte/rainbyte
Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|