RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date:
Wed, 2 Apr 2014 17:51:40 +0000
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Pilar McAdam <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Traves McCabe asked:

*         Do you define retirement\separation to include all prior inactive jobs and all current active jobs?


*         Are you treating the retention based on whether the employee is currently active regardless if they held multiple jobs years past, and therefore keeping all prior records until the current active job becomes inactive and starting the retention at that time?


*         Scenario: Employee comes back to organization 9 years later, do you remove the retention from these prior records and now wait till their new current status becomes inactive to start the retention over?

I'd keep things as simple as possible.  If an employee returns, I'd considered the retention clock as reset (voiding any earlier termination + X retention clocks).  Retention calculations wouldn't start up again until the employee left again.

Just one woman's opinion.


Pilar C. McAdam, CRM
[log in to unmask]
Los Angeles, CA

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2