RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2014 09:58:43 -0500
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
From:
Comments:
To: RAINbyte <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Missing Transmittal Envelope Was Not The Intentional Spoliation Of Evidence
Justifying Indiana Tax Court’s Dismissal Of Income Tax Appeal | Faegre
Baker Daniels - JDSupra
*No duty to retain envelopes.  *The Department’s retention schedule
required it to keep individual income tax returns for six years from the
date of filing. It must keep all tax returns for three years.  Slip op. at
10 (citing Ind. Code § 6-8.1-3-6(a) (2009).) But was a transmittal envelope
part of the tax return?  “No,” the Court held.  Slip op. at 11. The Court
reasoned that the plain meaning of “tax return” included only the forms
used to report and compute the taxpayer’s liability, not the transmittal
envelopes.

http://bit.ly/1s4smbz

Source:
http://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/missing-transmittal-envelope-was-not-the-51041/
See if people are clicking on this link: http://bit.ly/1s4smbz+
Try the bitly.com sidebar to see who is talking about a page on the web:
https://bitly.com/pages/sidebar

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2