RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 8 Nov 2006 16:01:55 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
I really dislike the term "forever" in relation to records retention.  Permanent is permanent.   Forever has no place in RIM retention policy...; perhaps the term is best used in fairy tales and romantic poetry.


<snip>I asked him about that.  He said 
that while they may debate about what should be permanent, permanent means 
forever.  He was very definitive about it.  I thought that was 
interesting.  I'm not sure anyone quite knows how to store records forever, 
particularly electronically.<snip>


Best regards, Steve
Steven D. Whitaker, CRM
Records Systems Manager; City of Reno

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2