RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Christian Meinke <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 Aug 2007 12:12:31 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (59 lines)
Larry provide two great examples, but I think something that gets
overlooked in these examples, is the countless cases that are settled just
to avoid the costs of discovery, which can be astronomical if you don't
have some sort of destruction process in place. Those in charge can easily
dismiss the examples where "wrong doing" is not adequately covered up, but
the cost to most businesses usually  isn't the smoking gun, it's the cost
of proving that no smoking guns exist that is most prohibitive.

                           Christian Meinke, CRM
                        Southern California Edison
                       Enterprise Resource Planning
                            Operations Support
                       Document & Records Management
                         (626) 543-7260/PAX 39260
                           Mobile (818) 414-9515
                         [log in to unmask]


Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]> wrote on 08/23/2007
11:59:17 AM:

> On 8/23/07, Roger Hamperian <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > Can anyone recommend some case studies that illustrate the hazards of
> > not destroying records that have met their required retention?
>
>
>
> Two salient cases come to mind off the top:
>
> RJ Reynolds, who was required to produce  documents regarding research on
> the negative impacts of smoking that  could have, but were not, destroyed
> in  the course of normal business after meeting their assigned retention.
>
> Arthur Andersen, who gave instructions for a mass disposal of records
that
> would have proven damaging to their client that should have been disposed
of
> 2-3 years earlier, but weren't.
>
> Larry
>
> --
> Larry Medina
> Danville, CA
> RIM Professional since 1972
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
> present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body
> of the message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2