Roger:
   
  I find it hard to believe that you would accept multiple years in a box which would put the company at risk.  Two partially filled boxes on the shelf would not put your company at risk and would not result in possible sanctions if your records management program was challenged for uniformity and consistency in court.
   
  Not a good practice or recommendation.
   
  Joe Vidal

Roger Hamperian <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
  This is a tough call. I agree with Graham. My first recommendation is to
combine with records of another series having the same retention.
Lacking that, for the sake of conserving space, I have allowed divisions
to combine consecutive years of the same series within a box. Granted
there is some increased risk, but I would rather do this than have two
partially filled boxes on the shelf.



Roger Hamperian

Lexington, KY 




List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]


List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]