I'm an advocate of backing up to film as well. It's been pretty well
proven what the lifespan of microfilm is. Imaging hasn't been around
long enough to know how long the records actually DO last, as compared
to film. Or, am I misinformed?

Steve Morgan

Information which is not communicated is valueless 
Information which cannot be found is worthless 


-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Miller, Charlie A
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 11:31 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Just out of curiosity.... is anyone still filming long term
records?

While we are moving more records to imaging all the time, we still
microfilm the majority of our court records. Those that have been moved
to imaging systems, depending on retention requirements are backed up to
film on an archive writer. 

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]