Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:37:06 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Gus,
Our records retention schedule does specify which is the original, or
primary, copy. This was determined from our records inventory and
analysis, and is specified in our retention schedule.
Gary Link, CRM
Astorino
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
-----Original Message-----
From: Gus Harris [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 11:10 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [RM] record copy vs duplicate records
I'm curious as to how others, within large organizations, determine what
are "duplicate records." In other words, without "officially"
designating where "record copies" of records are
(departments/offices/divisions/branches within your organization) do you
simply "take employees word for it" in relation to disposing of such
records as "duplicates?"
Thank you in advance for any comments you may have regarding this.
Gus Harris
Records Manager
The Univ. of West FL
Pensacola, FL
[log in to unmask]
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance To unsubscribe
from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place
UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|