RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Scanning of Microfilm
From:
Gerry McFatridge <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 29 May 2008 08:39:58 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines) 
A year or so ago we finished scanning all of our microfilm (aperture
cards). 

For most of that stuff we scanned the original film. The last few
thousand cards we used the dupes. We did not notice any appreciable
difference.

All things considered though I would scan from the originals if you have
easy access to them.


Gerry
VaBeach, VA

-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of WALLIS Dwight D
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 3:39 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: FW: Scanning of Microfilm

Hi, folks - it's me again.

<snip>

One question that immediately pops into my head: Is it safe/preferable
to scan from silver original film, or should we have the vendors scan
from diazo duplicates? 


Dwight Wallis, CRM

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2