LOL....I think it was the second one

-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of Peter Kurilecz
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 1:38 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Retention Question

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Sharon Morris <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

>
>  The inactive retention status was determined by reviewing
> any legal statues


was it this one
http://tinyurl.com/5gjd67

or this one
http://tinyurl.com/6gkuqw

or maybe this one?
http://tinyurl.com/63jnwf

;-)
-- 
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present,
place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]