Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 3 Jul 2008 12:29:42 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I agree with you Larry. This has long been a misunderstood point. A backup
is just that and not meant for "records storage". These tapes (or whatever
media you use) are intended to put you back to an instance prior to a mishap
and not for regular retrieval. Essentially, I would not call backup media a
record.
On 7/3/08, Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > How do you segregate records with different retention periods on your
> > backups?
>
>
> This is an interesting question... if you think about the reason backup
> tapes are made to begin with (to restore a system in the event of a
> catastrophic failure or unintentional destruction of information) there is
> no legitimate reason to go to the effort of segregating information on them
> by a retention period. They should mirror your storage systems that they
> support, and IF those systems have information segregated, then the backups
> would as well.
>
> I can understand how this question would be pertinent to ARCHIVE tapes, but
> it doesn't seem to pertain to backup tapes.
>
> Larry
>
> --
> Larry Medina
> Danville, CA
> RIM Professional since 1972
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
> present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the
> message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>
--
Graham Kitchen
(866) 333-2015
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|