RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Legal Ruling Shakes Up E-mail Archiving
From:
Taina Makinen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 7 Jul 2008 11:28:52 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines) 
On 7/6/08, John Phillips <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> What would be interesting for us would be if there were any attorneys on
> this list that could comment about how oranizations within the jurisdictions
> of a particular Circuit court must immediately accept and implement any
> rulings.

My understanding is that this ruling hinged on the employer's
inconsistent application of the policy, so the decision was specific
to the case and therefore might not have any farther-reaching
implications for email archiving per se. Sort of like last year's "RAM
is a document" issue where Judge Chooljian ordered that TorrentSpy had
to preserve its server log data (although I don't know whether that
order survived TorrentSpy's appeal).

Regards,
Taina Makinen
[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2