RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Frank Addamo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 19:24:52 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (91 lines)
Selectively following the destruction rules set out in your retention
schedule could cast doubt on the entire thing...at least in the minds of
those paying attention in court.

Regards,
Frank Addamo
775 475-0869
Cell 775 742-3197
www.atdoc.com 


-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of McLemore, Dustin
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 1:24 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Overcoming Opposition to Retention Schedule Implementation

Hi Fellow "Listers",

 

I, along with a colleague (who is also a list member), conducted a
training session for our organization today which is just launching a
formal records management program.  I was brought on to put things in
motion.  As such, I have been conducting site audits, launching
inventories and getting retention schedules formalized in a cooperative
effort with the City's corporate records department.  In the class
today, we were discussing retention schedules and what they mean to the
utility as a whole.  There were a few individuals who have severe
opposition to "throwing records away" even when past their retention
period.  The question was "well why can't we just hang on to them?"  I
informed them that three benefits to the utility were to reduce storage
space, cost and possible liability in public information/open records
requests.  My colleague added that since the retention schedule was a
legally binding document, documents did need to be disposed of at the
end of their retention period, if no additional action was required.
Despite this reasoning, there were still several individuals who did not
"see the need" for a retention schedule. 

 

I was wondering if anyone could provide some feedback on what to tell
these individuals hesitant to implement retention and control schedule;
aside from what we have already told them.  "Real world" examples would
also help.

 

Thanks so much!

 

Regards,

Dustin D. McLemore, MPA ('08)

Records Liaison Officer

City of Austin d/b/a Austin Energy

721 Barton Springs Road

Austin, TX 78704

 E-mail:    [log in to unmask]
<mailto:[log in to unmask]> 

 

This information is intended solely for the person(s) named herein and
may contain material categorized as official government business.  You
are hereby notified that unauthorized reproduction or dissemination of
any data contained in this transmission is strictly prohibited pursuant
to the laws of the State of Texas.  If you are not the named recipient,
please delete this message and notify the sender immediately.

 


List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present,
place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2