A special naming taxonomy for electronic records kind of goes against the idea that a record is a record is a record, doesn't it?
Tom Owens
RIM analyst/Manager
-----Original Message-----
>From: bobd <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Jul 9, 2008 10:19 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: [RM] Question on Name Criteria for Electronic Records
>
>Someone off the list asked - "can you recommend a publication or have any
>info for recommendations for naming criteria for electronic records?"
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]