On 7/10/08, Tom Owens <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> A special naming taxonomy for electronic records kind of goes against the
> idea that a record is a record is a record, doesn't it?
>
>
not necessarily. when you consider that users will come up file names that
make sense only to them and no one else. I can't tell you how many times
I've seen file names that consist of just a person's name and a date.

here is Taina's search results refined just a bit

http://shrinkster.com/106m

here are some selected  items from the result

http://shrinkster.com/106n

http://shrinkster.com/106o

http://shrinkster.com/106p

http://shrinkster.com/106q

-- 
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]