Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:26:11 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 1:33 AM, Don Saklad <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> ...for a single 8 1/2 x 11 inch sheet with a dozen listings publicly
> posted on the bulletin board by the entrance at the reference desk.
> Then removed upon the occasion of asking to read it.
I'm confused. The item was publicly posted on a bulletin board that you
could easily access. Couldn't you have taken a piece of paper and pencil and
copied the names and numbers?
> Should our public officials be paid twice for their time with their
> salary and with an additional fee?...
well in looking at the response you received, maybe the item that was posted
was not the most up to date version. Thus they had to take time to locate
the most current version, reviews it to make sure that no PII was posted and
redact it
>
>
> Should the value of the time and energies of public records requestors
> be factored in when records custodians deny or delay access and make
> necessary repeated followups before disclosing the public records?...
nope, it was your decision to make the request.
>
>
> Is the spirit of public records principles really put into practice
> in that there's not a deterrent?...
?
> Should our public libraries' reference departments litigate in
> performing informational reference desk services?... Is that good
> customers services for library users/customers/clientele ?...
a reference department is there to answer questions. you are making a public
records request which is a different creature and process.
--
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|