Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:45:10 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
All being well, RIM would have the say-so on what filing equipment is
purchased for the company. This particular department would get no new
equipment until the backlog has been cleared up.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> List:
>
>
>
> Yesterday, I found out that one of our departments is not following
> their retention schedule. Just how little they are following it, I don't
> know. A little about the specifics:
>
>
>
> Contracts are to be destroyed 4 years after expiring. The trigger is
> the expiration/termination date and the actual retention is "End of year
> plus 4." Apparently, they have never gotten rid of any expired
> contracts. Also, they have a lot of contracts that we have no records of
> but, that's not my main concern right now as that's easily addressed.
> Anyway, does anyone have any example of penalties handed out (relatively
> RECENTLY) for failing to follow their retention schedule?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>
>
> Steven D. Morgan
>
> Knowledge is of two kinds: we know a subject ourselves, or we know where
> we can find information upon it.
>
>
>
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
> present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the
> message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>
--
Graham Kitchen
OTECH International.
(866) 333-2015
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|