RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 26 Jul 2008 15:30:02 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (42 lines)
Us this link to access the internal links
http://shrinkster.com/10mz

Sent to you by pakurilecz via Google Reader: More "Must Read" 2008
Cases - Part Three - Including My Favorite, the Wesley Snipes Tax
Evasion "e-Document Dump" Case via e-Discovery Team by Ralph Losey on
7/24/08

This is the third and final installment of the"Must Read" 2008 Cases
series that I began two weeks ago. The series reviews, in alphabetical
order, thirty 2008 e-discovery cases. They are good reference cases
that have some lesson to teach, but have not previously been featured
in this blog. Part One covered ten cases A-J in just over 4,700 words.
Part Two covered seven more cases in 4,150 words, but I only got
through two letters in the alphabet, H-I. This last stage will cover
the rest of the alphabet, covering 13 more cases in 5,100 words. My
favorite is the Wesley Snipes tax evasion case, which not many people
know has an interesting e-discovery component to it. U.S. v. Snipes,
2007 WL 5041892 (M.D. Fla. Dec. 24, 2007). Of course, the Ninth Circuit
case about the swat team officer in California who constantly used a
police pager to send sexy text messages at work is pretty good too.
Quan v. Arch Wireless, _F.3d_, 2008 WL 2440559 (9th Cir., June 18,
2008).

Mikron Industries Inc. v. Hurd Windows & Doors, Inc., 2008 WL 1805727
(W.D. Wash. Apr. 21, 2008).
This is an interesting opinion by Seattle District Court Judge Robert
S. Lasnik interpreting Rule 26(c) and 26(b)(2)(B). Defendants in this
breach of contract case sought an order shifting the costs of producing
ESI to Plaintiff, arguing that the requests were burdensome and
cumulative. Judge Lasnik denied the motion on both procedural and
substantive grounds.

-- 
Peterk
Richmond, Va

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2