RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kevin Tisdel <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:11:03 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (85 lines)
I have noticed a dichotomy in the answers received here and from other 
research. 

1) If you are in state or local government entity, the trend seems to be 
to hold on to production.  Is this because of laws and regulations?

2) If you are in the business arena, the trend seems to be separating the 
files into two categories (i.e., litigation files and production).  The 
produced records are sent back to the business owners and processed using 
the applicable retention periods.  The litigation files are held onto for 
a specific period (most have stated 10 years).

Several in-house counsels stated "the definition of what constitutes a 
litigation record was up to the in-house litigation counsel".
 
Kevin Tisdel 
Director of Corporate Compliance
Shaw Industries Group, Inc.
P.O. Drawer 2128
Mail Drop 061-28
Dalton, GA 30722-2128
* Email: [log in to unmask]  
( Phone: 706.275.1177                  
6  Fax: 706.275.1442



"Devir, Brian" <[log in to unmask]> 
Sent by: Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
07/30/2008 07:49 AM
Please respond to
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>


To
[log in to unmask]
cc

Subject
Re: Closed Litigation Records Definition and questions






I agree with Peter's responses regarding the fact that all documents
collected for use in litigation should be part of the litigation case
file; however, my current counsel does not agree and considers copies of
document collections created solely for discovery production  to be
nonrecord material, to be destroyed when "no longer needed", namely,
when they say so. 

Was wondering if anyone had any sources of reference that might support
Peter's opinion?  Always nice to have some identifiable sources to
reference when discussing with your attorney's!


Brian R. Devir
RM Field Officer
Department of Energy
EM Consolidated Business Center
Cincinnati, OH 
513-246-0604

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already 
present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the 
message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]



**********************************************************
Privileged and/or confidential information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or are not responsible for delivery of this message to that person) , you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and notify the sender by reply e-mail.
If you or your employer do not consent to Internet e-mail for messages of this kind, please advise the sender.
Shaw Industries does not provide or endorse any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of the company  or its subsidiaries.
**********************************************************

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2