LISTSERV - RECMGMT-L Archives - LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

	LISTSERV Archives
	RECMGMT-L Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: Are new retention periods retroactive?
From:	Janet L Nelson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:55:12 -0500
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (22 lines)

I have always gone with the decision the new, approved retention schedule
supersedes all previous ones.  In my previous position we had a lot of
litigation and never had to defend this position.  Also, if your
disposition is being carried out by your RM software, having two retention
periods for the same record series might be difficult to handle.

***********************************
Janet Nelson CRM
Manager Records
Dairyland Power Cooperative
3200 East Avenue South
PO Box 817
La Crosse WI 54602-0817

[log in to unmask]
608/787-1218

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.IGGURU.US