LISTSERV - RECMGMT-L Archives - LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

	LISTSERV Archives
	RECMGMT-L Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	FW: [RM] Are new retention periods retroactive?
From:	"Link, Gary M." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Wed, 13 Aug 2008 08:04:43 -0400
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (25 lines)

Does not our definition of a record series include a phrase to the
effect of "... and having the same retention."? And if two groups of
records have different retention periods, are they not now, by
definition, two different record series?

-----Original Message-----
From: Link, Gary M. 
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 7:36 AM
To: 'Records Management Program'
Subject: RE: [RM] Are new retention periods retroactive?

Could we resolve the issue by creating two different record series
instead of one record series with two different retentions?

Gary Link, CRM
Astorino
Pittsburgh, PA

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.IGGURU.US