RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:26:26 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Hi Judy, 

I agree with that point but it's not exactly the point I was making. My
point is that in big bucket theory the organization can explicitly choose to
keep records series longer than the minimum statutory requirement and
document that decision in the policy and the retention schedule, essentially
citing "organizational business requirements" as the retention
justification. In that case there would be no issue and it seems to comport
with the links I sent yesterday. 

Cheers, 

Jesse Wilkins
[log in to unmask] 

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2