RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Gaynon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Oct 2008 09:06:31 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (47 lines)
Fred

I think that such statistics should only be used when you are aware of the methodology and have trust in the reliability of the principal investigator responsible for the research.  I suspect that these numbers originated in one or two proprietary studies done many years ago and that the numbers were subsequently increased by various individuals who exaggerated to make a better story. This is a common phenomena which is why graduate students often learn the importance of "sourcing" particular data or claims.  Sometimes false information from a century ago gets perpetuated in fields literature simply from being used over and over again by various authors.

I would expect that most of these studies are based on surveys of how much time people within an organization spend looking for a misfiled record which are then multiplied by a wage rate with a few extra costs added in for good measure.  Such studies probably group misfiled and poorly filed records together.  A poorly filed record is a record that is correctly filed but still does not meet retrieval needs in a particular set of circumstances.  Suppose accounts payable organizes their records by vendor name and I need to see all the vendor files that have sold a particular class of products.  The documents may be correctly filed but they still may not be that easy to find.

The answer of course is to conduct your own study.


-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Grevin, Fred
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 11:53 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Q: cost per mis-filed record

On behalf of a colleague in the New York State Archives, I'm posting this question of general interest.

"I am giving the Files Management workshop on Thursday and in reviewing the information provided, the $125 per misfiled record cost is shown.
That was the figure I used over 20 years ago and I am trying to see if a more current one is available. Google search gave $125, $150 and $200 but no real sources were provided. Are you aware of anything?"

Searching the RM listserv archive produced little in the way of dollar-specific results.

Many thanks in advance.


Fred
===================================================================
Frederic J. Grevin
Deputy Commissioner and Chief Information Officer The City of New York, Department of Records
Email: [log in to unmask]
Land phone: 212.788.8615
Cell phone: 347.436.5360
Fax:  212.788.8614
www.nyc.gov/records
31 Chambers Street
New York, NY 10007
USA

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2