RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Gaynon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 2 Oct 2008 08:17:13 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
 One should be very careful in the use of proprietary studies.  Such studies are often written within the context of customer expectations and may suffer from various methodological flaws or may be constructed to maximize or to minimize the costs associated with specific issues such as "lost files".  For example, should a firm's entire vital records program be calculated into the costs associated with lost files?  How about a firm's entire risk management program (including all insurance of physical assets)?  Depending on how  you calculate such things into your cost allocations will certainly determine how much you are spending to mitigate the problem of lost files.  A study by itself does not provide much value unless you have insight into the underlying methodology.



David Gaynon

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2