RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Offsite storage box barcodes
From:
"McLemore, Dustin" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:36:34 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines) 
Joe...One word - 3 times: NO NO NO!!!!!


One reason is that destruction logs are often coded by box number and/or
barcode number.  In almost all cases, destruction logs have a permanent
retention value.  Duplication in barcode numbers can cause severe
problems when verifying that a box has indeed been destroyed.

r/
dm
--
Dustin McLemore, MPA
Austin Energy
512-505-3777
[log in to unmask]
 
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of joe adams
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 1:16 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Offsite storage box barcodes

Hello... does anyone have an opinion on reusing offsite storage box
barcodes? I'm trying to find out if it makes sense to keep the box
barcodes so as not to have the expense of permanent removal charges
incurred.  

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2