I think you hit that right on the head.  I guess the first thing to do is 
to figure out if the PIC is considered a governmental entity or if it is a 
private one...and then even if it is 'licensed'...well, does that mean that 
the project people are the ones who would need to consider this, or the 
PIC?  

Whomever is ultimately responsible might consider these submissions just 
content, and the book as being the record, so I could see these staying up 
until the bills aren't paid anymore, and the site is just taken down.  
That's just my gut feeling on it, though.

As usual, the listserv has given me a lot to think about...thanks!

Kelly Hamilton
[log in to unmask]



On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:29:50 -0500, Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]> 
wrote:
>
>...then it would be up to the PIC to determine if they are of record status
>and what the retention period would be for them.  However, it stated the
>project is NOT AFFILIATED with the PIC, rather that they have 'licensed'
>this to be the official book.
>
>So I would pose the question directly to the PIC, because anything anyone
>else says here would simply be an opinion or an educated guess.

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]