Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:33:27 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Can I nominate you for an Emmett Leahy award?
Greg:
You're much too kind - but I'll take it <g>!. Does the Leahy come with
money?
But seriously, as you, Ginny and a number of others have pointed out a
combination of things is needed to improve the management & control over
electronic records - user training, partnering with IT, and automated
systems (when & if you can afford them). You can add taxonomies to that.
It's interesting that for many auto-classification systems to work well
they need to be paired with a taxonomy to have a standard set of rules
to work from. Otherwise you don't get close to the accuracy level
needed. It's ironic that you can get the most resistance to developing a
taxonomy from some of the areas that clamor the most loudly for
auto-classification (IT, executive management among others). Another
example of where we need to work harder on education.
Jimmie E. Savage, CRM
Manager, Member Data Services
(512)-542-6281
[log in to unmask]
Teacher Retirement System of Texas
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|