RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:39:52 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (61 lines)
Dwight ... well said.  


Robert W. Dalton, CRM
Dalton Consulting
1-253-229-4555
[log in to unmask]

"This communication is intended for the sole use of the individual and
entity to whom it is addressed, and may contain information that is
privileged, confidential and excempt from disclosure under application law.
If you have received this communication in error, please notify me
immediately by calling 1-253-229-4555, or by reply to this communication



-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of WALLIS Dwight D
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 10:40
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [RM] RAIN drop: everything is a record?

A session I went to at the recent ARMA conference pointed out that the
number of e-mail files alone in a typical 10K employee enterprise
exceeds the total amount of content tracked by Google. The "cheap
storage/Google/the next big thing" reasons to keep everything, as noted
in this article, need to be taken with a grain of salt, as, to date,
they have not proven particularly valid, despite the fact that they have
been promoted to varying degrees for the past 2+ decades (the current
"Google analogy" replacing the earlier "full text indexing" analogy).

Having said that, I could see a variation of an approach like this taken
in certain circumstances. One of the striking things I've noticed about
conversations around this issue is a lack of any sense of risk
assessment, scale, or relative importance of the electronic records
being maintained (ie, no understanding of retention "values"). Why would
one apply this kind of vacuum cleaner approach to everyone's emails
across an enterprise? Landfills come to mind... 

Dwight Wallis, CRM
Records Administrator
Multnomah County Fleet, Records, Electronics, Distribution and Stores
(FREDS)
1620 S.E. 190th Avenue
Portland, OR 97233
Phone: (503)988-3741
Fax: (503)988-3754
[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present,
place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2