Hi Peter,
Sure: as we migrated a record from the old system of record to the new, we were migrating in batches. In this particular case study, we lost the event/chron date + retention period. It ended up being a move into the the new system that did not have the...sophistication (ie. script)...to accomodate the original event/chron date plus the retention period at the object level from the former system. In essence, in the new system, it became a newly declared record. The old declaration time stamp was lost.
Mimi Dionne.
--- On Fri, 2/27/09, Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
From: Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [RM] Metadata in the courts
To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Friday, February 27, 2009, 7:06 PM
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Mimi Dionne <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> For example, one of the issues I made management aware of was that the
> retention period started over after the migration successfully took.
Could you expand upon the above?
--
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va
Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present,
place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
