RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Furlow, Brad" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:01:50 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
It is so great to see this conversation occurring today.

Has anyone ever had to convince legal, IT & the "C-level" that a 90-day
retention is fine for non-record emails, but that content should
determine retention, not storage space or cost of said space?

I would LOVE to hear how you approached "the powers that be" about this
matter, as I am sure I will have to go in with case-study in hand.

If you would like, please contact privately.  ANY experiences would be
helpful.

Brad Furlow
Records Manager
[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2