Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:45:38 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Michel El Salsero <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Just want to get some your inputs about the following aspects:
>
> 1). Archiving of records = Storage (onsite or off-site) before the disposal
> period - What do you think?
first of all banish the phrase "archiving of records" from your vocabulary.
The IT world has b*astardized the term 'archive' to mean storage. Archive in
the truest sense refers to records that have a long term value to an
organization.
Typical inactive records (depending on their volume and frequency of access)
will be transferred to an offsite facility to wait out their retention
period. Some organizations have semi-active storage areas on site that are
used to store records that are not required on a daily basis but maybe
required on a weekly basis. Very rarely seen these days
>
>
> 2). What will be a best standard method for conducting a quality control of
> records?
need further information as to what you mean by "quality control of
records". are you referring to ISO 9000 by chance
--
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va
Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|