In our case, it's a matter of politics. To update the retention involves
filings with the regulators and all the messiness that accompanies it,
including what ends up being an invitation to micro-manage our program. In
the end, the cost of retaining certain items a little longer is far less
than the political costs, especially when weighed against more pressing
issues we want to take before our regulators.

                           Christian Meinke, CRM
                        Southern California Edison
                          Information Governance
                          (626) 302-7133/PAX 27133
                           Mobile (818) 414-9515
                         [log in to unmask]


Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]> wrote on 05/06/2009
11:17:47 AM:

> I really have a difficult time understanding how you can use a 1985
version
> of a NARUC document that has been updated by NARUC, with the latest dated
> Oct 2007.
>
>
> Robert W. Dalton, CRM
> Dalton Consulting
> 1-253-229-4555
> [log in to unmask]
>

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]