RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lee Michael <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 14 May 2009 12:51:54 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
<snip>

On Wed, 13 May 2009 10:38:51 -0400, Manago, William M 
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

can a document rise to the level of a record, if the document has not been 
formally transmitted to or communicated with one or more recipients?
<snip>
As my friend Larry says: "it depends".

In general, yes, since transmission or communication of content has nothing to 
do with the value of the content.  A record is based on its content, context, 
and structure.  Transmission and communication affects the context and may 
affect the structure, but does not affect the content.

But, this all seems moot without establishing "your" definitions of: data, 
content, information, document, and record.  Some see these definitions as a 
hierarchy, others seem them as independent.

In my view, a document could also be considered an in-process record (it is 
not yet complete and is still active).  Once the document is complete (you 
define completion), it is no longer a document and is now a record.  It cannot 
hold both definitions at the same time.


Lee Michael, CRM

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2