Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 4 Jun 2009 14:02:23 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I agree that, as a professional association, ARMA does not have a
> charter to police the vendor community. HOWEVER, ARMA can be the venue
> for best practices for records practitioners, and have indeed addressed
> records storage best practices with two standards - "Guideline for
> Evaluating Offsite Records Storage Facilities" and "Records Center
> Operations, 2nd Ed." This particular issue most certainly should be
> addressed in the next revision of these standards.
or this issue could be addressed in a new guideline. if so then one could
submit a proposal to the SDC
http://www.arma.org/standards/development/overview.cfm
both of the documents mentioned above were developed collaboratively with
members from the RM profession and vendor community.
--
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va
Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|