Very clear.
Thank you again, Luciana.
----- Original Message -----
From: Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wed Jun 17 20:17:26 2009
Subject: Re: [RM] Section of a Records Management Application
A vendor standard requires the product to respect it in order to be
certified. Users can choose to buy a certified or a non certified
product depending on the organization's requirements. For example,
agencies of the US Federal Government would have to buy products
which are DoD 5015-2 certified. Canadian agencies do not and there
is no standard that tell them what is appropriate for them to have as
a recordkeeping system.
A user standard does not require any product to do anything and does
not certify products. It tells a user who operates within a certain
community (e.g. the European Union, which commissioned through the
European Commission and endorses the Moreq2 standard) that, for the
community to consider his/her records trustworthy and his business
accountable, he/she has to use a recordkeeping system that fulfills
certain requirements, such as applying a classification system, a
required set of metadata, a disposition schedule, etc. to all the
records stored in it. How the user does assemble such a system and
what the user buys is not prescribed by anybody. So the user may
choose to buy a complex system capable of implementing all the
required and optional modules, if it is a large and complex
organization, or may select to have a few off the shelf or open
source inter-operable applications that only satisfy the required
modules. In addition, the various required modules can be adapted to
the culture of the country and/or the organization. This means that,
depending on the needs of the business, each organization will have a
different system. Finally, user standards apply to everyone,
regardless of the community in which they belong, because those who
are not bound by their requirements can use them as generally
accepted guidelines on putting together their own recordkeeping system.
I hope this clarifies it. If not, ask again. Best regards back,
Luciana
At 04:13 PM 17/06/2009, you wrote:
>Luciana Duranti said "The primary difference between Moreq2 and DoD
>5015.2 is that the former is a user standard while the latter is a
>vendor standard."
>
>Luciana, how do you define "user standard" and "vendor standard"?
>
>Thank you, and best regards.
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Wed Jun 17 18:20:38 2009
>Subject: Re: [RM] Section of a Records Management Application
>
>The primary difference between Moreq2 and DoD 5015.2 is that the
>former is a user standard while the latter is a vendor standard. As
>a user, you can implement Moreq2 using any combination of
>applications and systems, and you can also adapt it to your
>organizational/cultural/national needs. Look at the Moreq2 Chapter
>0, which is different for each country. And look at all the
>non-required modules which you can implement in different
>combinations with the required ones.
>
>Luciana
>
>At 02:01 PM 17/06/2009, you wrote:
> >Peter Kurilecz asked " ... why would an organization located in Missouri
> >use that as the basis for a FRD?"
> >
> >Because MoReq2 is more applicable to general business needs than is DoD
> >5015.2. DoD 5015.2 is a U.S. Department of Defense requirement, and the
> >needs of DoD are given special consideration. A general business entity
> >may not share those needs.
> >
> >Best regards, as always.
> >
> >Fred
> >===================================================================
> >Frederic J. Grevin
> >Deputy Commissioner and Chief Information Officer
> >The City of New York,
> >Department of Records
> >Email: [log in to unmask]
> >Land phone: 212.788.8615
> >Cell phone: 347.436.5360
> >Fax: 212.788.8614
> >www.nyc.gov/records
> >31 Chambers Street
> >New York, NY 10007
> >USA
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
> >Behalf Of Peter Kurilecz
> >Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 15:33
> >To: [log in to unmask]
> >Subject: Re: [RM] Section of a Records Management Application
> >
> >On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>
> >wrote:
> >
> > > Peter's suggestions are all excellent. I'd suggest you may also want
> >to
> > > review MoReq2, which is much more prevalent in Europe but which is
> >probably
> > > slightly more broadly applicable.
> >
> >
> >not knocking MoReq2 but since that is more of european focus
> >
> >
> >--
> >Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
> >[log in to unmask]
> >Richmond, Va
> >Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
> >electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers
> >
> >List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> >Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> >To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
> >present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of
> >the message.
> >mailto:[log in to unmask]
> >
> >List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> >Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> >To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
> >present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body
> >of the message.
> >mailto:[log in to unmask]
>
>Dr. Luciana Duranti
>Chair and Professor, Archival Studies
>Director, The InterPARES Project www.interpares.org
>Director, Digital Records Forensics Project www.digitalrecordsforensics.org
>School of Library, Archival and Information Studies www.slais.ubc.ca
>The University of British Columbia
>The Irving K. Barber Learning Centre
>Suite 470, 1961 East Mall
>Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z1 CANADA
>Tel: 604.822.2587
>Fax: 604.822.6006
>www.lucianaduranti.ca
>_________________________________________________________________
>Note: This email (including all attachments and content conveyed
>hereby) is intended for the addressee, in person or position, only.
>Unauthorized use, distribution or action based on this email is
>prohibited. No rights of ownership are waived or lost through
>transmission, misdirection or interception. If you are not the
>intended addressee, kindly notify the sender immediately and expunge
>all traces of this email from all relevant data systems.
>
>List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
>Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
>To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
>present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body
>of the message.
>mailto:[log in to unmask]
Dr. Luciana Duranti
Chair and Professor, Archival Studies
Director, The InterPARES Project www.interpares.org
Director, Digital Records Forensics Project www.digitalrecordsforensics.org
School of Library, Archival and Information Studies www.slais.ubc.ca
The University of British Columbia
The Irving K. Barber Learning Centre
Suite 470, 1961 East Mall
Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z1 CANADA
Tel: 604.822.2587
Fax: 604.822.6006
www.lucianaduranti.ca
_________________________________________________________________
Note: This email (including all attachments and content conveyed
hereby) is intended for the addressee, in person or position, only.
Unauthorized use, distribution or action based on this email is
prohibited. No rights of ownership are waived or lost through
transmission, misdirection or interception. If you are not the
intended addressee, kindly notify the sender immediately and expunge
all traces of this email from all relevant data systems.
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
