I believe it is accepted usage to refer to 5015.2 RMAs as being
"certified", meaning they passed the test and are on the JITC list,
rather than "compliant" which some vendors use to create the false
impression that they have passed the test.
-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Peter Kurilecz
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 7:13 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Section of a Records Management Application
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Nolene Sherman <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> I have been developing a "wish list" of functionality for an EDRMS
system
> and have used MoReq2 extensively. I just find it much more readable
than DoD
> 5015. I would not say it is European-centric. The requirements are
based on
> ISO 15489 and are applicable anywhere that wants a comprehensive
records
> management software system.
>
There is nothing wrong with using MoReq2 to develop a functionality
wish
list. My suggestion to use 5015.2 is based upon the fact that vendors
submit
their products to JITC for compliance testing. Such testing has only
just
started with MoReq2, and information about the testing program can be
found
here. http://www.moreq2.eu/downloadsc.htm
I would suggest that MoReq2 required functionalities be cross-walked
against
the 5015.2 required functionalities, that way when you look at product
that
is 5015.2 compliant you will know how it matches up against MoReq2.
If you are more comfortable using MoReq2 than 5015 that is fine, but
recognize that it will take longer for a vendor to respond. If your RFP
asks
"Are you 5015 compliant?" the question is easily answered and verified.
One additional point, just because a product is 5015 compliant doesn't
mean
that a private organization has to implement the 5015 model. For example
the
product I work with has 3 models that can be implemented Base, 5015 and
MoReq (the original). The vast majority of the customers I've worked
with
have implemented the Base model. Why 3 models? Because the company wants
to
sell to the broadest customer base.
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va
Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of
the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This communication, along with its attachments, is considered confidential and proprietary to Vistronix, Inc.
It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above.
Note that unauthorized disclosure or distribution of information not generally known to the public is strictly prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately.
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
