>
> I saw that. We're using it for ARMA task force work. I noted in the article
> that Microsoft encourages the purchase of Confluence
> (http://www.atlassian.com/software/confluence/ ) to provide the wiki
> feature
> SharePoint lacks. This is something that would be very useful for
> collaboration but should be included. And there are other features lacking
> or not robust enough that I won't get into.
>
> Having used this and other products, I'm very disappointed in SharePoint.
> it
> seems Microsoft doesn't understand how people work in the real world.
>
> Pat
So yeah.. it's like I said a long time ago about M$ sharepoint as a
collaboration tool... it ain't no Yahoo Groups, and it ain't free!!
Even including the wiki feature through a 3rd party interface, you can't
capture exchanges and document decisions in many/most wikis as to who said
what when... and in certain processes thee is a requirement that is
captured. The use of e-mail within a YG supported that.
Larry
--
Larry Medina
Danville, CA
RIM Professional since 1972
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]