RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: CA Document Retention Requirements - request
From:
Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:00:43 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines) 
Would it ever be possible for those in the legal arena to stop using the
phrase "document retention" and adopt the phrase the rest of us use,i.e,
"records retention?"

Sorry for the rant but the former phrase just plain grates on my nerves

On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Pat Franks <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I received an inquiry from someone attempting to build a private-sector
> document retention schedule in California.
> --- request ---
>
> I am in  the process of suggesting a best practices for our firm's
> California Document Retention Requirements.




-- 
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va
Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2