RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: CA Document Retention Requirements - request
From:
Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:18:55 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines) 
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:00:43 -0400, Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

>Would it ever be possible for those in the legal arena to stop using the
>phrase "document retention" and adopt the phrase the rest of us use,i.e,
>"records retention?"
>
>Sorry for the rant but the former phrase just plain grates on my nerves

>> I received an inquiry from someone attempting to build a private-sector
>> document retention schedule in California.

But...but....but....  It's SOOOOO much simpler to develop a document
retention schedule, just one citation...

"Keep it until you want to discard it"

=)

Now PaK??  Back to vacationing for you!! I'm sure there's a nice warm beer
somewhere nearby with your name on it...

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2